| Requester | Wage Average | # Reviews | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIT Economics Study | Good | 284 | |
| Rahul Bhui | Good | 472 | |
| Diana Orghian | Fair | 196 | |
| Choice and Risk | Good | 141 | |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology, ECCL Lab | Good | 141 | |
| Lottery Choices Studies | Good | 39 | |
| Hannah Ruebeck | Good | 63 | |
| Jingkang Gao | Good | 42 | |
| Doug Beeferman | Generous | 61 | |
| Clara | Fair | 51 | |
| James P Houghton | Fair | 95 | |
| Research Methods | Fair | 1184 | |
| MIT ESG Lab | Generous | 73 | |
| Jake | Good | 70 | |
| Information Study | Generous | 670 | |
| Edward Davenport | Good | 62 | |
| tedlab | Good | 831 | |
| Alex M | Good | 41 | |
| Nabeel Gillani | Good | 39 | |
| Scalable | Good | 174 | |
| Paula Rubio-Fernandez | Good | 79 | |
| MIT-PERL | Good | 198 | |
| S_2019 | Fair | 49 | |
| Opinion Lab | Low | 44 | |
| Benjamin | Good | 32 |